Binance closes Tether trading in Europe to comply with MiCA regulations

Binance, one of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges in the world, has announced the cessation of spot trading of Tether (USDT) in the European Economic Area (EEA): the move is part of the compliance plan with the new directives introduced by the European regulation MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation).

Marking consequently a further step in aligning the crypto industry with the regulatory principles of the European Union.

 

Summary

Regulatory pressure from MiCA on the crypto sector increases: stop to spot trading for Tether in the EEA by Binance

Even though Binance has delisted the spot trading pairs linked to USDT, users in the EEA will not be completely deprived of the possibility to manage this asset. In fact, it will still be possible to custody the tokens not compliant with MiCA and trade them through perpetual contracts.

The removal concerns exclusively spot trading, that is, immediate buying and selling operations on the market.

The shares of the exchange are part of a broader plan announced in March, according to which all spot trading pairs linked to non-compliant tokens would be removed by March 31.

This with the objective of meeting the local requirement of complete delisting by the first quarter of 2025.

Binance is not the only one reacting to regulatory pressure. Kraken, another major exchange, took similar measures as early as February, announcing the delisting of spot trading pairs for tokens including USDT, PayPal USDTether EURtTrueUSD, and TerraClassicUSD.

According to an official communication published on Kraken’s portal, starting from March 24, users in the EEA area can only sell USDT, with a total block on purchasing.

In fact, this results in a significant limitation of operations, although not a complete exclusion of the asset.

Other tokens involved in the delisting

In addition to USDT, Binance has removed several other stablecoin and non-compliant MiCA tokens from spot trading. Among these are:

  • – Dai (DAI)
  • – First Digital USD (FDUSD)
  • – TrueUSD (TUSD)
  • – Pax Dollar (USDP)
  • – Anchored Euro (AEUR)
  • – TerraUSD (UST)
  • – TerraClassicUSD (USTC)
  • – PAX Gold (PAXG)

The portfolio of the affected tokens demonstrates how the new regulation imposes a higher standard of transparency, security, and regulatory framework to allow the circulation of criptovalute in the EU.

Despite the increasing restrictions, not everything related to non-compliant tokens is prohibited.

A spokesperson for ESMA (European Securities and Markets Authority) clarified on March 5th that offering custody and transfer services for non-compliant stablecoins does not constitute a violation of the MiCA regulation.

However, the same ESMA has advised European crypto service providers to interrupt all transactions related to non-approved tokens after March 31, creating a certain degree of ambiguity on the concrete application of the guidelines.

The MiCA regulation, which came into force with the aim of uniformly regulating the cryptocurrency sector within the European Union, imposes new conditions that particularly concern:

  • – The mandatory authorization of crypto service providers
  • – The transparency of whitepapers
  • – The reserve requirement for stablecoin issuers
  • – Surveillance on systemic risks

One of the main impacts is precisely on stablecoins, like USDT, which will have to demonstrate that they have solid, transparent, and accessible reserve assets.

The platforms that wish to maintain the trading of these tokens within the European market will need to ensure that the assets are fully compliant.

What does it mean for the future of crypto trading in Europe?

The choice by Binance and Kraken to limit spot trading rather than completely exclude the tokens demonstrates a pragmatic strategy.

By still offering custody services and operations on derivatives, the exchange leave a door open to users, keeping part of the demand operational while complying with regulations.

However, in the long term, it is evident that non-compliant cryptocurrencies risk being progressively marginalized in the European market.

The operators are already working to adapt to the new standard, and it is not excluded that many tokens that are not compliant today may evolve to meet the MiCA criteria.

The decision of Binance to close spot trading of USDT in the EEA marks a key moment in the crypto compliance journey in Europe.

The concrete application of the MiCA regulation begins to shape the behavior of exchanges and service providers, pushing the entire ecosystem towards greater transparency and regulation.

In the meantime, even if the custody of tokens remains allowed, European users will need to prepare to navigate a market with a limited offering for certain assets.

The transition is now underway, and 2025 will likely mark the definitive alignment of the European crypto sector with MiCA standards.

Related Posts

Deploying smart contracts on the Ethereum blockchain

First of all, one or more developers must obviously create the smart contract by writing the appropriate lines of code, and then they must send it to the Ethereum network.

In technical terms, publishing it on the Ethereum blockchain means making all the nodes in the network receive and execute it. Once published, all instructions in it will always be executed by all nodes in exactly the same way.

Therefore, not only its publication but also the execution of instructions is irreversible once it is published on the blockchain.

Therefore, what really matters are the instructions it contains – which can be the most diverse – and how many people use it. Indeed, in order for the instructions of a smart contract to actually be executed, there must be one or more transactions that invoke them.

It is also worth remembering that these instructions generally involve the use of resources, such as data or tokens, so for them to actually be executed, all the conditions set as necessary must be met. 

Sometimes this data comes from outside, thanks to so-called oracles, while sometimes it simply comes from transactions on the blockchain.

Usually, the transaction that triggers the execution of the instructions contained in a smart contract involves the payment of a fee in ETH, and in many cases in order to actually trigger the execution also involves the payment or sending of tokens specific to the smart contract itself, or other smart contracts.

Technically, smart contracts are a type of account on the Ethereum blockchain, “controlled” by the network rather than a central entity. They can store ETH or tokens, and can also send transactions on the network autonomously.

A contract in the Solidity language would be like a kind of union of a code (the functions) and data (its state) located at a specific address on the Ethereum blockchain. Each contract contains declarations of state variables, functions, function modifiers, data structures and events.

The possible trigger: an update from Binance

At 10:30 UTC, Binance announced changes to the leverage and margin requirements for perpetual contracts on several pairs, including ACT/USDT. The announcement specified that the new rules would also apply to existing positions.

According to some analysts, this could have:

  • Activate automatic adjustments in arbitrage and market making bots
  • Trigger liquidations on cross-margin positions
  • Spread rapidly to the spot market as well, creating a domino effect

A pseudonymous user on X, Game, explained:

“The update hit the perpetual, but it also sent the spot into a panic. Those who had connected positions began to close them quickly, amplifying the crash.”

The phenomenon has spread beyond Binance, with similar movements recorded on:

  • Other centralized exchanges
  • Decentralized platforms (DEX)

In some cases, the tokens were quickly purchased by algorithmic or manual traders who took advantage of the flash crash.

Tokens like KAVA, in fact, were purchased at a discount and recovered value in a few minutes.

Leave a Reply