South Korea: crackdown on crypto platforms not compliant with local regulations

The financial authorities of South Korea are considering countermeasures against those crypto exchanges that operate in the country without complying with the strict regulations in place.

The Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of the Financial Services Commission has launched an investigation into several platforms suspected of offering services to South Korean investors without proper registration as Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs).

Among the possible sanctions, the blocking of access to these exchanges and other restrictive measures are envisaged.

This decision is part of a broader strategy for the regulation of cryptocurrencies in South Korea, a country that has introduced strict rules to ensure greater transparency and security in the sector.

The case also involves major platforms, including KuCoin, while simultaneously suspicions of financial misconduct also emerge among the main South Korean exchanges.

 

Monitoring on crypto exchanges: criteria and potential sanctions in South Korea

The South Korean government requires that crypto service operators report their activity to the FIU based on the Specific Financial Information Act.

Anyone offering exchange, custody, brokerage, or management of virtual assets services without following this directive is considered to be operating illegally, risking administrative and criminal penalties.

According to local sources, the FIU has launched an investigation into various exchanges, identifying those that provide marketing and customer support to South Korean investors without being officially registered.

The authorities are planning to technically block access to these services in the country.

An official from the FIU confirmed that the government is considering concrete measures, in collaboration with the Korea Communications Standards Commission, the authority responsible for the regulation of the internet in the country.

The objective is to block access to non-compliant exchanges to protect investors and maintain control of the crypto sector.

Among the platforms that would have come under scrutiny stands out KuCoin, one of the most well-known exchanges globally.

In response to the investigations, a spokesperson for KuCoin told Cointelegraph that the company closely monitors regulatory developments worldwide, including South Korea.

The company reiterated its commitment to compliance normativa, emphasizing that a responsible approach is essential for sustainable development of the crypto sector.

Although the statements of the platform show attention to local regulations, it remains to be seen if it will succeed in complying with the standards required by the South Korean authorities.

The investigations into South Korean exchanges: the Bithumb case and the corruption charges

In parallel with the investigations into foreign exchanges, South Korean regulators are addressing suspicions of financial misconduct also among the local exchanges.

On March 20, prosecutors searched the Bithumb headquarters following allegations of embezzlement against the former CEO, Kim Dae-sik.

Kim is suspected of having used company funds to purchase an apartment, in violation of financial regulations.

However, the company responded by stating that the former CEO had already arranged to reimburse the funds through a loan, rejecting the allegations of misconduct.

Besides the Bithumb case, rumors about illicit practices related to the listing of new digital assets have emerged.

According to anonymous sources cited by Wu Blockchain, some projects have allegedly paid million-dollar fees to intermediaries to be listed on exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb.

In the face of these accusations, Upbit has requested transparency, inviting the source of the accusations to reveal the names of the projects involved.

The absence of concrete details still makes the developments of this matter uncertain, but the reported favoritism practices in the listing could compromise the credibility of the crypto sector in South Korea.

The impact of regulations in South Korea

In recent years, South Korea has adopted strict regulation in the cryptocurrency sector, imposing stringent guidelines for exchanges and financial service operators.

The regulations aim to reduce the risks of money laundering, fraud, and market manipulation, increasing security for investors.

However, these restrictions have led some platforms to operate in a non-compliant manner, putting their presence in the South Korean market at risk.

The possible block of access to foreign exchanges could push local investors to use exclusively services registered in the country, ensuring greater control by the authorities.

On the other hand, some experts believe that excessive regulatory rigidity can limit innovation and competitiveness in the crypto sector. The delicate balance between security and growth in the sector remains a crucial challenge for the future of cryptocurrencies in South Korea.

The South Korean authorities are intensifying their oversight of cryptocurrency platforms, both local and foreign, enforcing compliance with existing regulations.

The possible closure of access to exchanges like KuCoin could revolutionize the crypto market in the country, while the investigations on Bithumb and the corruption charges on other platforms fuel doubts about the integrity of the sector.

The future of the cryptocurrency market in South Korea will depend on the balance between regulation, security, and innovation, in a context that continues to evolve rapidly.

Related Posts

Deploying smart contracts on the Ethereum blockchain

First of all, one or more developers must obviously create the smart contract by writing the appropriate lines of code, and then they must send it to the Ethereum network.

In technical terms, publishing it on the Ethereum blockchain means making all the nodes in the network receive and execute it. Once published, all instructions in it will always be executed by all nodes in exactly the same way.

Therefore, not only its publication but also the execution of instructions is irreversible once it is published on the blockchain.

Therefore, what really matters are the instructions it contains – which can be the most diverse – and how many people use it. Indeed, in order for the instructions of a smart contract to actually be executed, there must be one or more transactions that invoke them.

It is also worth remembering that these instructions generally involve the use of resources, such as data or tokens, so for them to actually be executed, all the conditions set as necessary must be met. 

Sometimes this data comes from outside, thanks to so-called oracles, while sometimes it simply comes from transactions on the blockchain.

Usually, the transaction that triggers the execution of the instructions contained in a smart contract involves the payment of a fee in ETH, and in many cases in order to actually trigger the execution also involves the payment or sending of tokens specific to the smart contract itself, or other smart contracts.

Technically, smart contracts are a type of account on the Ethereum blockchain, “controlled” by the network rather than a central entity. They can store ETH or tokens, and can also send transactions on the network autonomously.

A contract in the Solidity language would be like a kind of union of a code (the functions) and data (its state) located at a specific address on the Ethereum blockchain. Each contract contains declarations of state variables, functions, function modifiers, data structures and events.

The MiCA regulation, which came into force with the aim of uniformly regulating the cryptocurrency sector within the European Union, imposes new conditions that particularly concern:

  • – The mandatory authorization of crypto service providers
  • – The transparency of whitepapers
  • – The reserve requirement for stablecoin issuers
  • – Surveillance on systemic risks

One of the main impacts is precisely on stablecoins, like USDT, which will have to demonstrate that they have solid, transparent, and accessible reserve assets.

The platforms that wish to maintain the trading of these tokens within the European market will need to ensure that the assets are fully compliant.

Leave a Reply