The SEC drops the case against Ripple: XRP is not a security

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has decided to withdraw its appeal in the case against Ripple, marking a crucial turning point in the long legal dispute.

According to the cryptocurrency expert lawyer John Deaton, this move represents the definitive confirmation that XRP tokens must be considered digital assets and not financial securities.

 

The importance of Ripple’s (XRP) cross-appeal in the legal case

The announcement by the SEC not to proceed with the appeal marks a significant victory for Ripple, which has been facing legal charges for years.

Despite this decision, a court order remains pending that requires the company to pay 125 million dollars for the alleged improper sale of XRP. However, with the SEC’s appeal filed, Ripple could negotiate a settlement to reduce the amount of the fine.

Deaton, known for representing XRP investors in the legal battle against the SEC, believes that Ripple now has an advantage in the negotiations.

“Everything has changed,” stated the lawyer, emphasizing how the cryptocurrency industry has undergone a significant transformation and the SEC has changed its approach towards the sector.

One of the key aspects in this matter is the cross-appeal filed by Ripple in October 2024.

According to Deaton, the SEC wishes to avoid a ruling on this appeal, as it could limit the jurisdiction of the commission and influence other ongoing disputes.

This gives Ripple an important negotiating leverage to review the amount of the fine or obtain more favorable conditions.

Despite the legal victory, Ripple still finds itself facing an injunction issued by Judge Analisa Torres. This decision prevents the company from selling XRP to institutional investors, to avoid potential violations of securities laws.

Deaton emphasizes that the main difficulty for Ripple now is overcoming this restriction and being able to provide XRP directly to U.S. banks. This obstacle could become a crucial point in the upcoming developments of the legal case.

Ripple remains a U.S. company

“`

An important aspect, according to Deaton, is that Ripple has never left the United States despite the lawsuit filed by the SEC.

The CEO of Ripple, Brad Garlinghouse, might emphasize the American character of the company in an attempt to strengthen the company’s position.

“We have faced legal action from the United States government and the Biden administration, but we are a company born in America and we have never left it,” Garlinghouse reportedly said.

This element could play a key role in future negotiations with the regulatory authorities.

Deaton recalls the moment when the SEC initiated the case against Ripple, describing it as an attack on the cryptocurrency sector. In his view, it was not just an isolated issue against Ripple, but a broader signal directed at the entire crypto ecosystem.

The lawyer also referred to the regulatory crackdown promoted by figures such as Elizabeth Warren and Gary Gensler, considering it to be a broader strategy by the traditional financial industry to curb the development of cryptocurrencies.

Conclusion

The decision of the SEC to withdraw the appeal against Ripple marks a significant turning point for the company and the entire cryptocurrency sector.

Although the issue of the $125 million fine and the injunction on the sale of XRP to banks still needs to be resolved, this victory strengthens Ripple’s position as one of the leading companies in the crypto world.

With the new dynamics at play, the future of XRP appears more promising, and the SEC’s decision could set a fundamental precedent for other legal disputes in the sector.

Related Posts

Deploying smart contracts on the Ethereum blockchain

First of all, one or more developers must obviously create the smart contract by writing the appropriate lines of code, and then they must send it to the Ethereum network.

In technical terms, publishing it on the Ethereum blockchain means making all the nodes in the network receive and execute it. Once published, all instructions in it will always be executed by all nodes in exactly the same way.

Therefore, not only its publication but also the execution of instructions is irreversible once it is published on the blockchain.

Therefore, what really matters are the instructions it contains – which can be the most diverse – and how many people use it. Indeed, in order for the instructions of a smart contract to actually be executed, there must be one or more transactions that invoke them.

It is also worth remembering that these instructions generally involve the use of resources, such as data or tokens, so for them to actually be executed, all the conditions set as necessary must be met. 

Sometimes this data comes from outside, thanks to so-called oracles, while sometimes it simply comes from transactions on the blockchain.

Usually, the transaction that triggers the execution of the instructions contained in a smart contract involves the payment of a fee in ETH, and in many cases in order to actually trigger the execution also involves the payment or sending of tokens specific to the smart contract itself, or other smart contracts.

Technically, smart contracts are a type of account on the Ethereum blockchain, “controlled” by the network rather than a central entity. They can store ETH or tokens, and can also send transactions on the network autonomously.

A contract in the Solidity language would be like a kind of union of a code (the functions) and data (its state) located at a specific address on the Ethereum blockchain. Each contract contains declarations of state variables, functions, function modifiers, data structures and events.

The MiCA regulation, which came into force with the aim of uniformly regulating the cryptocurrency sector within the European Union, imposes new conditions that particularly concern:

  • – The mandatory authorization of crypto service providers
  • – The transparency of whitepapers
  • – The reserve requirement for stablecoin issuers
  • – Surveillance on systemic risks

One of the main impacts is precisely on stablecoins, like USDT, which will have to demonstrate that they have solid, transparent, and accessible reserve assets.

The platforms that wish to maintain the trading of these tokens within the European market will need to ensure that the assets are fully compliant.

Leave a Reply